Close takes longer than it should
Period-end feels manual and pressured. The same exceptions repeat. No one has mapped the real sequence.
Reliable numbers, faster
Automation without a commercial outcome is just expensive housekeeping.
Extryve changes the work that slows profitability, cash flow, visibility, and growth, protects your people and your margin, so your business moves instead of managing itself.
Are you redesigning the finance workflow, or just automating the drag around it?
When close drags, cash follow-up slips, process knowledge sits with one person, and new tools do not change the work, the issue is usually not the team. It is the workflow around them.
Cash sits in AR too long
Follow-up is manual, inconsistent, and hard to prioritise.
One person holds the process together
Process knowledge lives in one person's head. If they leave, the workflow breaks.
Automation did not deliver
Tools were added, but the work around them stayed manual.
What we are not.
None of the four patterns above get solved by adding another tool.
We diagnose the workflow before recommending any automation. Your systems stay. Your team stays in control. Every material decision stays with your finance team.
AI demo shop
AI supports your team. It does not replace judgment. Every automation has a defined approval gate.
SaaS in disguise
No extra login or dashboard to manage. The workflow improves without new software layered on top.
ERP replacement
Your systems stay. We redesign the gaps between them, the invisible manual work.
Generic transformation
One workflow, defined scope. If build work is not justified, we say so.
Outcomes we are built to deliver.
Redesigning the workflow only matters if it moves something real.
That is not a slogan. It is the filter every engagement runs through. Here is what we hold each one accountable to:
Profitability
Does this remove rework, leakage, repeated checking, avoidable manual cost, or margin erosion?
Cash flow
Does this reduce lag in billing, collections, approvals, renewals, or follow-up, so cash moves sooner?
Decision visibility
Does this surface the signal early enough for leaders to act before the decision window closes?
Commercial protection
Does this catch contract risk, pricing leakage, renewal exposure, scope creep, or control gaps before they cost the business?
People capacity
Does this move finance people away from spreadsheet assembly and into judgment, control, and commercial partnership?
Growth support
Does this help the CFO support better pricing, sharper deals, M&A decisions, revenue opportunities, or expansion?
Where the work applies.
These are the workflows where that accountability gets applied.
Extryve works with two kinds of finance leaders: CFO teams improving the operating rhythm of the business, and PE operating partners improving finance control across portfolio companies.
Office of the CFO
For operating companies.
Close, cash, reporting, planning, or margin control depends too much on manual work.
This is where accountability becomes a clearer workflow: owners, evidence, exceptions, and decisions.
Explore CFO services → Private equityFor GPs and operating partners.
Inconsistent portco finance blocks value creation, exit readiness, and portfolio visibility.
This is where accountability becomes a clearer portfolio view: comparable workflows, risks, priorities, and interventions.
Explore PE services →How we work.
Three stages. You decide at every gate.
Each stage delivers a defined output. You decide whether to continue after each gate. The tool matches the problem, not the other way around.
Map your workflow
45 minutes, virtual. Bring what you can. We'll map it together and confirm whether a diagnostic makes sense.
Bring what you canDiagnostic
Scoped paid engagement. One workflow. 2 to 3 weeks. Defined output and clear recommendations.
Workflow map · Process knowledge capture · Risk and control gaps · Prioritised planBuild work
Scoped only after the diagnostic. Based on what was found. If not justified, we say so.
Only if justifiedThe people behind the work.
Finance judgment. Delivery discipline.
Numbers only mean something if the people behind them can be trusted to repeat it. Extryve is led by a finance operator who has owned close, cash, margin, governance, and P&L, and a delivery operator who has run complex, multi-country programmes with structured execution control.
Yasir Aarafat, CPA
Co-founderEnterprise finance, commercial finance, FP&A, governance, M&A, P&L, and transformation across Serco Group, Workday, Sodexo, and Compass Group.
Rashed Mamun, PMP
Co-founderDelivery operator with PMP discipline, Lean Six Sigma process training, multi-country project governance, and implementation risk experience.
Common questions.
Straight answers.
Are you an AI platform?+
No. Extryve is a finance workflow advisory business. AI may support parts of the workflow, but it is not the product.
Do you replace our ERP?+
No. Your ERP stays. We work on the workflow around it.
Will you automate financial decisions?+
No. Judgment, material exceptions, commercial interpretation, and accountability stay with your finance team.
What does this cost?+
The workflow mapping call is 45 minutes and focused on the workflow causing the most pressure. Diagnostic pricing is confirmed after the workflow scope and complexity are clear.
How much time will our team need?+
Enough to show us how the workflow actually runs. Usually this involves the finance lead, the process owner, relevant team members, and a systems or data contact.
What if the diagnostic shows we do not need automation?+
Then we say so. Some workflows need redesign, ownership, documentation, or controls before automation. Some do not need automation at all.
Next step
Start with the workflow causing the most pressure.
The diagnostic tells you what is causing it and whether any of it needs technology.
Do not automate what you do not yet understand. Let's map your workflow →45 min, virtual · Bring what you can, we'll map it together
Prefer email? contact@extryve.com